We may be fighting the war alone,
but we have to remember that we are not the only one fighting the war.
In the world we live in, we cajole
us into believing that everyone is unique in their actions. Actions result from
circumstances that occur only to us & it can never really happen to someone
else at the same time, in same combination & sequence. As a consequence, we
tell ourselves that the outcome of our efforts cannot be compared with others
who tried the same thing albeit in a different manner. On the contrary, we fail
to realise that in the world we live in, as a result of globalization and uniformity,
every social activity has already been done by someone else. So even if you
tell that his life is different from yours, you can’t escape the fact that
comparison is inevitable.
Take any example: preparation for
exams, making a movie, Office work, relationship issues. In almost every one of
these situations, due to the variation in absorbing the knowledge from the
world, the approach can vary slightly; but only slightly, because, we all have
been conditioned in the same environment and taught the same lessons; alas in
different manners. So even though there
is bound to be some deviation in the way we approach our life, due to the
standardization of life lessons we are all basically different manifestation of
the same entity. Therefore, if someone who had grown up in the same milieu, tells
that the preparation for an entry exam can be completed in 3-4 months, you can
also do it within the same time period, give or take few days. The deviation in
time happens only to fill the gap in knowledge and alacrity that the
benchmarked person had over you. But one has to remember that, that person
maybe weak in something in which you have a better grasp.
With the illustrations mentioned above, it would seem I am taking only the generalised activities in the social milieu which warrants minimal creativity. But the
comparison isn't merely among oranges and apples. It is among numerous variants of
oranges and apples. Though separated by mutation & evolution, if we strip
down the complexities that circumvent these genera & look at them in a holistic
manner, they primarily are oranges. And so is tomato a fruit. The point I am
trying to raise here is that no matter how unorthodox & out of the box one’s
thinking & execution maybe, as long as we base our analysis on preexisting
materials we can never proclaim to have done something new. It is not like we
created a new world to see something new. Even if such a surreal event is to
happen, as long as we reckon it with our existing knowledge we can’t claim it
to be ours. Suppose humans were to see world through the brains of a lion
things might look different.
But, if we keep on turning blind
eyed over the fact that we are all the same people working on the same agenda,
we will eventually become complacent over the outcome of our efforts. People like
Selvaraghavan are the epitome of the case I am trying to put forth here.
Overridden by the self-pride that they are doing something unique, they skip
over the fact that they need to do it well. Granted, they might be pushing the
frontiers in many aspects, but without the imbibition of existing achievements,
the leap forward will end up only being a limping one.
In a world where we are preached to be unique, this post makes me question whether we are ??
ReplyDeleteAlso the concept of apple and orange is unclear..I thought its an idiom ..are u suggesting they are d same...
i faltered a bit as it raced towards the end of the post. Your question about apple & orange is genuine & i did an update to the post. Hope this would clarify your doubt.
ReplyDeletePS: am not comparing apples to oranges. Am taking about the variants in oranges.
Harish.. I lost you in this :( I thought I kinda got what you were trying to say till I came to the "as long as we base our analysis on preexisting materials we can never proclaim to have done something new. " thing. I am definitely hoping for a longer part 2! Please....:)
ReplyDelete